Issues with Google and Page Rank
I think everyone should leave Matt Cutts a piece of your mind on this topic.... it's really important to the future of your Internet business. They are discounting paid links and non-relative reciprocal links which makes it very hard to rank for a site now.... very difficult.stevenar wrote:Ah so it is going to happen. That guy in the interview i was talking about in another thread said they were going to find a way to stop link buying and end link exchanging sites.. i still didn't look for for the video but i THINK it with was with Charles Heflin.
Google wants the very best sites at the top of the search engines.. It would make sense that they want to stop link buying/exchanging. they want the sites with the best content at the top of the search engines.. not the sites that can buy the most links. By stopping link buying only the very best sites with the best content will gain natural links and will be at the top. And honestly I like the idea.. It will help MY seo strategy.
Authority Sites are the future! Everyone get with it! :lol:
stevenar wrote:Thats where authority sites come in though. When you have an authority site you get thousands and thousands of sites linking to you and you dont spend a dime.
For an example.. in my first week of my gaming website i got a link from curse-gaming which is the 3rd most visited MMORPG gaming site on the net.. just because my content is that good. I got also got 3 links from the website of the game im writing content about.. they got a page rank of 7. When you write good quality content everything just happens for ya. It's really great :)
I just don't think it is a sound strategy... there are way too many unknowns... and they are going to have a hard time figuring out if a link is paid or not. You could say the same for the print world.... is a company not going to be allowed to place an ad in the newspaper or on a billboard because it is going to gain them more traffic? Sorry but Google crossed the line.... if they wanted to fix things.... they should not count non-relative links. Their own page-rank system came full circle and hit them square in the face.
You could say the same for the print world.... is a company not going to be allowed to place an ad in the newspaper or on a billboard because it is going to gain them more traffic?
stevenar wrote:I just don't think it is a sound strategy... there are way too many unknowns... and they are going to have a hard time figuring out if a link is paid or not. You could say the same for the print world.... is a company not going to be allowed to place an ad in the newspaper or on a billboard because it is going to gain them more traffic? Sorry but Google crossed the line.... if they wanted to fix things.... they should not count non-relative links. Their own page-rank system came full circle and hit them square in the face.
Well the way google thinks of links is a vote for your site. By buying links your just trying to trick google into thinking your sites good.
In the print world your buying an ad spot and if people are intrested they will come. No tricking is involved in doing this and nobody is losing.
Not sure how the two can be comparable.
Google is not saying you cant have links and get traffic through them.. they're just saying don't get fake links.
I wonder how google will find out if you bought links though.. I'm sure they will not just believe the person reporting a bought link... they would need some kind of system..